Plug Into PayFi: Infrastructure For a Smarter Financial Future

What happens when the foundational components of modern finance: compliance, auditability, and programmable money, are reimagined for the blockchain era?
On May 21st, Concordium hosted an X Spaces event with Jack Nikogosian, CEO of Aryze. The conversation ranged from real-world payment flows and stablecoin architecture to enterprise adoption barriers and the invisible future of blockchain.
Whether or not you’ve heard of Reforge, programmable FX rails, or Stablecoin-as-a-Service, this summary breaks down what they unlock and explains why Aryze is building on Concordium.
1 INTRODUCTION AND FRAMING
1 INTRODUCTIONANDFRAMING
0:00
/89.887347
- Speaker: Mike Milner, Chief Commercial Officer, Concordium
- Purpose of the Session
- Welcomes both returning and new participants to the Concordium community
- Opens the discussion around PayFi and stablecoin infrastructure
- Introduces the guest speaker: Jack Nikogosian, CEO of ARYZE
- Concordium’s Mission
- Core objective: De-risk adoption of stablecoins for institutional users
- Key risk areas addressed:
- Compliance and reputational risks
- Triggered by handling anonymous assets
- Solved through Concordium’s integrated identity layer
- Custodial risk and execution complexity
- On other chains, payment flows require funds to be sent to smart contracts
- Concordium eliminates this via native programmable money at the protocol layer
- Transition to Partnership Context
- Introduces ARYZE as a new infrastructure partner that can enable a lot
2 ARYZE’S INTRODUCTION AND STRATEGIC OUTLOOK
2ARYZESINTRODUCTIONANDSTRATEGICOUTLOOK
0:00
/115.252245
- Speaker: Jack Nikogosian, CEO, ARYZE
- ARYZE’s Track Record and Focus
- ARYZE has spent years perfecting what blockchain must become to be usable by TradFi and PayFi
- Parallel drawn: just as Concordium focused on compliance infrastructure, ARYZE focused on building better stablecoin infrastructure
- Scalability Defined
- Scalability includes:
- Support for multiple currencies
- Support for multiple blockchains
- Inclusion of requirements from traditional and payment finance sectors
- Scalability includes:
- Real-World Relevance
- Aims to solve problems faced by real-world companies in TradFi
- Describes 2025 as the start of the “era of implementation”
- No longer about invention, but bringing existing innovations to real-world deployment
- Partnership with Concordium enables issuing many types of stablecoins, using Concordium’s technology for real-world implementation
- Comments
- https://t.me/c/1659427635/29785 (178 words)
3 WHY CONCORDIUM?
3 WHYCONCORDIUM
0:00
/138.866939
- ARYZE partnered with Concordium because clients asked for it
- These clients include major FX firms, banks, and interbank settlement players, SEPA, SWIFT etc.
- They require solutions that are:
- Trusted
- Compliant
- Regulated
- ARYZE received repeated feedback:
- “We can’t use Ethereum”
- “We need to know X and Y”
- There was no other viable suggestion—Concordium was the only fit
- Both companies share Scandinavian roots, which made collaboration natural
- Neither ARYZE nor Concordium takes shortcuts, both focus on doing things properly
- The result: they can now offer serious institutions a credible addition to their existing systems
- Comments
- https://t.me/c/1659427635/29786 (103 words)
4 PRODUCT STACK AND NEXT STEPS
4PRODUCTSTACKANDNEXTSTEPS
0:00
/200.489796
- ARYZE has been building since 2017, with a mission to perfect stablecoins
- Goal: issue fiat tokens across as many currencies as seen in a Revolut-style FX dropdown
- Product Focus
- Move beyond USD and EUR to support hundreds of tokenized currencies
- Recognized early that many-to-many tokenization was inevitable
- The Core Problem
- Traditional FX works well in TradFi
- In crypto, conversion between exotic stablecoins is inefficient and liquidity dependent
- Swaps rely on risky, often illiquid pools, which raises concerns over compliance and origin of funds
- ARYZE’s Solution: Reforge
- Invented a burn-and-mint mechanism
- Example: burn EUR, mint USD
- Avoids reliance on third-party pools or swaps
- Supports a growing list of assets:
- Fiat: EUSD, EEuro, EPound, ESGD
- Metals: EGold, EPlatinum, EPalladium
- More to follow
- Once holding any ARYZE stablecoin, users can convert to any other via Reforge
- Converts traditional Forex into a single on-chain function
- Invented a burn-and-mint mechanism
- Comments
- https://t.me/c/1659427635/29787 (138 words + video)
5 STABLECOIN-AS-A-SERVICE AND PARTNERSHIP VALUE
5STABLECOIN AS A SERVICEANDPARTNERSHIPVALUE 1
0:00
/361.952653
- Why Building Stablecoins is Hard
- Not a technical issue, it’s a legal and compliance challenge
- Multiple failed models in crypto: asset-backed, crypto-backed, algorithmic
- Trust hinges on:
- Proper asset management
- Backed reserves in safe instruments (e.g., short-term U.S. Treasuries)
- Credible audits (ARYZE works with Grant Thornton; most crypto firms are rejected)
- ARYZE’s SCaaS Offering
- Provides an end-to-end stablecoin issuance platform:
- Solvency, legal setup, issuance, treasury, and cross-chain support
- Fast-tracks clients in ~12 months
- Offered at a cost lower than one engineer per month
- Provides an end-to-end stablecoin issuance platform:
- Strategic Shift: Scale via Diversity
- ARYZE no longer aims to create the dominant stablecoin
- Strategy: enable dozens or hundreds of branded stablecoins for institutions
- Examples: Red Cross token, Maersk settlement token, Tradeshift
- Recent launches:
- Sodom Global USD
- Torres USD
- Gold token for BCIF
- Five new coins for a major PSP, aiming to exceed 100 issued coins in a year
- What the Concordium Partnership Enables
- Mike’s conclusion:
- Combined, Concordium and ARYZE offer plug-and-play issuance of BLT stablecoins
- ARYZE handles:
- Reserve management
- Audits
- Issuance and mint/burn
- Concordium provides:
- Native identity
- Compliance layer
- Programmable money at base layer
- Timing and Market Relevance
- 2025 marks a shift:
- Post-administration change
- New institutional entrants designing entry strategies
- These entrants evaluate solutions based on regulatory and financial risk, not tech hype
- This partnership directly addresses those concerns
- 2025 marks a shift:
- Comments:
- https://t.me/c/1659427635/29789 (295 words)
6 MAINSTREAM ADOPTION – BARRIERS AND REALITY
6MAINSTREAMADOPTIONBARRIERSANDREALITY
0:00
/283.402449
- Jack’s Perspective on Adoption
- Disagrees with many crypto-native views on mainstream adoption
- Believes crypto will succeed by becoming invisible, not by being understood
- Analogy: “Magnetism didn’t get adopted via the credit card. People used the card, not the underlying tech.”
- Example: Jack’s mother began using ChatGPT via Snapchat
- Adoption happened on her terms, not via direct engagement with OpenAI
- Crypto adoption will mirror this: users won’t know or care about the blockchain layer
- Infrastructure Has Matured
- A decade ago: no standards, no real exchanges, no good custodians
- Now: proper exchanges, institutional custodians (e.g., Fireblocks), clearer regulation
- Enterprises (top 20–25) now have Web3 strategies and are willing to engage
- Mike Reinforces
- Adoption must be simple and seamless
- Blockchain is best when it acts as “backend plumbing”
- Usability—not technical literacy—will drive mass use
- If using crypto required understanding the backend, adoption would stall entirely
- Comments
- https://t.me/c/1659427635/29790 (178 words)
7 INTEGRATING IDENTITY AND COMPLIANCE FOR ENTERPRISE USE
7INTEGRATINGIDENTITYANDCOMPLIANCEFORENTERPRISEUSE
0:00
/248.711837
- Real-World Enterprise Demands
- FX markets process $7.5 trillion daily, a scale stablecoins are just beginning to match
- Global payment infrastructure players now have appetite for blockchain, but only with proper safeguards
- These enterprises require:
- Compliance with standards
- Rigorous participant vetting
- Transparency where needed (e.g. commodities trades in steel, etc.)
- Limitations of Web3 Today
- Anonymity, while valued in Web3, is a barrier for institutional adoption
- Traditional institutions won’t adopt unless identity and compliance are addressed
- Crypto’s decentralization helps speed, but misses the “last mile” requirements of TradFi
- Role of Concordium
- Concordium solves the identity hurdle
- Not by exposing all data, but by enabling selective disclosure
- Enterprises can cryptographically verify required attributes without full KYC exposure
- It’s not a CBDC model—only what’s needed is shared
- Concordium solves the identity hurdle
- Use Case: Trade Finance
- Example: payments triggered by real-world logistics events (e.g. ship departure, cargo unloading)
- ARYZE enables smart money logic
- Concordium’s infrastructure makes automated, conditional payments secure and compliant
- Comments
- https://t.me/c/1659427635/29826 (157 words)
8 MIKE MILNER EXPANDS ON WHY THIS HASN’T WORKED—AND WHY IT CAN NOW
8MIKEMILNEREXPANDSONWHYTHISHASNTWORKEDANDWHYITCANNOW 1
0:00
/156.577959
- Trade Finance: Why Blockchain Promises Fell Short
- Trade finance has long been cited as a use case for blockchain (e.g. payments triggered by GPS events)
- Problem: on most chains, this requires locking funds in smart contracts for 60–90 days
- That exposes capital to:
- Custody risk
- Cyber risk
- Most enterprises won’t tolerate this level of exposure
- Concordium’s Advantage
- Concordium’s programmable money allows logic to sit in the smart contract
- But funds stay secure at the base layer, reducing risk dramatically
- This architecture finally enables real-world execution of these long-theorized use cases
- Identity: Selective Disclosure
- Over-sharing is a persistent flaw in traditional identity systems
- Concordium enables only the required information to be verified (e.g. age > 18)
- This enables use cases like age-verifying payments, combining privacy with compliance
- For enterprise adoption, anonymity isn’t always a feature—it can be a bug
- Advocates may see it as a strength
- But to a Fortune 500 boardroom, it’s a liability
- Comments
- https://t.me/c/1659427635/29828 (253 words)
9 PRIVACY, ILLUSIONS OF ANONYMITY, AND HOW MONEY REALLY MOVES
9 PRIVACY ILLUSIONS OF ANONYMITY AND HOW MONEY REALLY MOVES
0:00
/216.665397
- The Illusion of Anonymity
- Despite claims of privacy, Web3 is not truly anonymous
- MetaMask use, exchange interactions, and behavior patterns all reveal identity
- Those who want to find out who you are can
- Anonymity tools (e.g. Tornado Cash) signal a different intent: “you’re wearing a different hat”
- Selective disclosure—only what’s needed—is actually more privacy-preserving
- ARYZE’s Reforge Model: Keep Money Still
- Challenges the norm of constantly moving money
- Proposal: don’t move money—keep it with the only entity that can’t lose it (governments)
- ARYZE holds reserves in short-term government bonds
- Reforge enables:
- Burning and minting between assets
- Functional conversion without actual money movement
- Mirrors how traditional banking works:
- Banks don’t physically move money, they net obligations
- Yet users still pay as if trucks were hauling cash
- Digital Cash” Concept
- ARYZE coined the term early: digital version of real, full-reserve bearer cash
- Allows for private transfers, without physical movement or traditional fees
- Institutional Adoption Is Catching Up
- A few years ago, ARYZE couldn’t implement this system in real markets
- Now, institutional readiness has changed
- Commodities trading, FX markets, and bank infrastructure firms are engaging
- Web3 will follow the AI path:
- Like AI, users won’t opt in consciously
- Institutions will integrate, and users will adopt indirectly and invisibly
- Comments
- https://t.me/c/1659427635/29830 (422 words)
10 CROSS-CHAIN STABLECOINS WITHOUT BRIDGES
10 CROSS CHAIN STABLECOINS WITHOUT BRIDGES
0:00
/442.015057
- Community Question
- Can ARYZE’s stablecoins (e.g. E-EUR, E-USD) exist on Concordium (like with a bridge)?
- Jack’s Response: Yes, But Not Like You Think
- Yes—ARYZE stablecoins will run natively on Concordium
- Already integrating E-EUR, E-USD, E-Gold on Concordium
- Also offering branded SCaaS stablecoins (e.g. for banks, PSPs, governments or whatever it may be)
- How Reforge Differs from Traditional Bridges
- Bridges
- Use smart contracts to lock assets and issue wrapped versions
- Rely on third-party liquidity (if pool based)
- Create central points of failure—targets for $100M+ exploits
- Bridges
- Reforge
- Built-in function in ARYZE’s stablecoins
- Burn on one chain, mint on another—no third-party custody
- Assets remain fully backed by short-term government bonds
- No wrapped tokens, no pooled liquidity, no smart contract honeypots
- Real-World Example: PSP Use Case
- New partner Blocks Global will use Reforge for strategic FX flows
- Avoids 1–3% costs on exotic corridors (e.g. Nigeria–Europe)
- They choose Reforge because they must stay compliant and can’t use unregulated liquidity
- Why Concordium is a Key Enabler
- Some jurisdictions (e.g. African nations exploring CBDCs) cannot use Ethereum
- Concerns over miner centralization
- Protocol governance vulnerabilities
- Concordium enables:
- Regulatory-grade ID
- Clean compliance
- Fast finality and neutral infrastructure
- Strong branding: Danish–Swiss trust pedigree
- Some jurisdictions (e.g. African nations exploring CBDCs) cannot use Ethereum
- Comments
- https://t.me/c/1659427635/29831 (497 words)
11 CLOSING REMARKS
11 CLOSING REMARKS
0:00
/90.673923
- Milner’s Wrap-Up
- Reiterates Concordium’s core mission: de-risking adoption for real-world stablecoin use
- Highlights how ARYZE’s approach aligns with this mission
- Jack’s Final Note
- Thanks everyone and mentions Bitcoin Pizza Day
- Announces a pizza party in Copenhagen with a 10,000 RYZE prize
- Competition for the most beautiful “ARYZE pizza”
- Invites the community to come meet the team and “put a face on the Viking avatar”
- Comments:
- https://t.me/c/1659427635/29834 (272 words)